# Non-fatal offences against the person

> **Key takeaway:** Assault/battery → s.47 ABH (assault MR only) → s.20 malicious wounding/GBH (foresee some harm) → s.18 intent GBH. GBH = really serious harm (incl. serious psychiatric). Ireland/Burstow; Savage/Parmenter. Consent limited.

- **Jurisdiction:** England & Wales
- **Practice area:** Criminal
- **Last reviewed:** 2026-08-04
- **Interactive page:** https://kttclegal.info/library/notes/Criminal/non-fatal-offences-oapa
- **Keywords:** ABH, GBH, OAPA 1861, section 18, section 20, section 47, assault, non-fatal offences, Burstow

## What is this about?

Non-fatal offences range from common assault to grievous bodily harm with intent. Most serious wounding/GBH charges are under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861; assault and battery remain common-law/summary offences with statutory mode of trial/penalty provision. Charging standards turn on injury level and mens rea.

## What is the core rule?

Common assault (assault or battery): intentional or reckless causing of apprehension of unlawful force, or application of unlawful force. ABH (OAPA 1861 s.47): assault occasioning actual bodily harm — any hurt that interferes with health or comfort and is more than transient or trifling (Miller), with mens rea of the assault only. Malicious wounding/GBH (s.20): unlawful and malicious wounding or infliction of GBH, with foresight of some harm. Wounding/GBH with intent (s.18): specific intent to cause GBH or resist arrest etc. 'Maliciously' in this context means intention or subjective recklessness as to harm (Mowatt/Savage).

## What are the elements or test?

1. Classify injury: none / ABH / wound / GBH
2. Identify offence: common assault, s.47, s.20, or s.18
3. Mens rea: assault recklessness; s.47 no extra MR as to harm level; s.20 foresight of some harm; s.18 intent to cause GBH (or other statutory intents)
4. Consent, self-defence, or lawful chastisement issues?
5. Charging standard and mode of trial implications

## Which authorities matter?

- **Offences Against the Person Act 1861, ss.18, 20, 47** — Core statutory ladder for ABH and GBH/wounding offences.
- **R v Ireland; R v Burstow [1998] AC 147** — House of Lords: silent telephone calls can be assault; GBH includes serious psychiatric injury; 'inflict' in s.20 does not always require technical assault.
- **R v Savage; DPP v Parmenter [1992] 1 AC 699** — Mens rea structure for s.47 and s.20; foresight of some harm suffices for s.20.
- **DPP v Smith [1961] AC 290 (context) / modern GBH meaning as really serious harm** — GBH means really serious harm; medical evidence often decisive for charging level.

## How does this apply in practice?

CPS charging standards guide injury classification but do not replace legal definitions. Consent to harm remains tightly limited (Brown). Domestic abuse context may engage controlling/coercive behaviour offences (SCA 2015) alongside OAPA counts. This note does not cover sexual offences.

## What are common pitfalls?

- Charging s.18 without evidence of intent to cause really serious harm
- Assuming s.47 requires foresight of ABH-level injury
- Ignoring psychiatric injury as potential GBH after Burstow
- Overlooking self-defence where force is admitted

## When would a practitioner use this?

Charge selection, plea advice on acceptable alternatives, and trial issues on injury and intent.

## Quick reference

Assault/battery → s.47 ABH (assault MR only) → s.20 malicious wounding/GBH (foresee some harm) → s.18 intent GBH. GBH = really serious harm (incl. serious psychiatric). Ireland/Burstow; Savage/Parmenter. Consent limited.

---

*Reference material from [KTTC Legal](https://kttclegal.info/), not legal advice. Work product supports instructing solicitors and barristers under their supervision. England & Wales.*